Education At War / Gove-centred learning

1S-8091867592_81f1b1790d_cUK teaching and learning is coming crashing down…

Last week Civitas, a right-of-centre think-tank commissioned by Herr Gove to report on education standards, announced it is to call for a new inspectorate for academies and free schools. Calling for the scrapping of ‘Sixties-mired’ Ofsted, apparently it will argue that ‘the Education Secretary’s wish for schools to develop their own approaches to teaching is being held back by child-first orthodoxies among inspectors, who are stifling innovation‘.

Well, not surprisingly this seemed to make Head of Ofsted Sir Michael Wilshaw just the tiniest bit cross, or as it was widely reported in the media he was ‘spitting blood‘, and that he had even fallen out with The Great Dictator himself.  Of course perhaps General Von Wiltshirehoffen should have known better than to announce that he would not hold back from criticising under-performing Free schools and Academies, and consequently preventing the complete ethnic cleansing of the entire left-wing in education. Even more surprisingly he apparently also said: ‘extreme educational philosophies’ had no place in modern schools, that some of his critics want  ‘children to be lectured for six hours a day in serried ranks’. and that such ‘rote learning would not produce successful learners who can think for themselves‘.

So is General Von Wiltshirehoffen in reality a Marxist Enemy Of Promise Double Agent in disguise? Anyway it’s good to know the enemy are busy fighting their own internal battles. Well, they were for a few hours anyway, because later that day Herr Gove said he fully supported General Von Wiltshirehoffen and would immediately execute exterminate dismiss anyone who said they didn’t, and then they both sat down together and had a really nice cup of tea and agreed they would be jolly good chums again, forever and ever.

But wait, they thought it was all over, when on Monday along comes David Green (Who’s he then?), the chief executive of Civitas, who clearly has no intention of allowing a peace process to erupt. Writing for The Spectator he is heavily critical of Wiltshire and Ofsted and promotes the need for a knowledge-led approach to learning in order to increase the performance of children who come from disadvantaged homes. So, if Herr Gove is true to his word, presumably one day soon there will be a knock on the door and David Green will never be heard of again.

Meanwhile All Change Please! was puzzled by the last phrase of Civitas’s original statement. First, what are all these unidentified ‘innovative approaches to teaching‘ that are being stifled? Presumably these involve traditional, old-fashioned approaches combined with a little help from computer-generated online knowledge-based, multiple choice questions, and a selection of dull and boring video clips, and based on the belief that all children are both created and grow-up equal, i.e. their needs are all exactly the same at any one point in time and space. And secondly, when Civitas criticises ‘child-first orthodoxies‘ is it really suggesting that the children should be seen to be of secondary importance in schools?

1S-Screen shot 2014-01-28 at 12.22.39Which came first? The children or the system?

All Change Please! suspects that the concept of ‘child-first’, or ‘child-centred learning’ is completely misunderstood by those whom it suits to do so. They believe it means allowing children to do exactly what they like, when they like and not imposing any order or notion of discipline or sanctions for misbehaviour, when in reality it involves a flexible, yet strongly structured, scaffolded approach to learning, focusing on and prioritising the interests, abilities, and learning styles of the students, rather than the needs of those involved in managing the educational process, such as teachers and administrators – and of course politicians. Thus it recognises the learner as an individual, rather than a future mass-produced widgit (ie a small gadget or mechanical or electronic component device). Which is not to say the needs of the teachers and administrators should be ignored, but just not prioritised over those of the children.

Then there is the curious belief, again strongly promoted by Civitas, that it is the local authorities that have been solely responsible for promoting ‘discredited, out-dated progressive child-centred learning‘, as if setting up Free schools or Academies will, entirely all on its own, completely by itself, without anyone else’s help, solve the perceived problem and enable teachers to get back to those so-called innovative methods of whole-class teaching.

But wait, there’s more… will you welcome please The Employers with a completely different priority. For them it’s not schools or children first, it’s the future economic success of their own businesses, or as they prefer to call it…’the country‘. Sadly, while the great and good generals, politicians, company directors and academics all appear to be having great fun scoring points of each each other in the name of education, it’s the innocent children and teachers in the trenches who are being slaughtered on a daily basis.

What’s really needed is some sort of balanced consensus that meets the differing needs of the children and the country, delivered within the realistic constraints of the schools, the managers and the teachers.  Surely that’s what the politicians should really be trying to achieve?

Meanwhile, the one clear approach that seems to be winning through can only be described as Gove-centred learning, and surely destined to produce a country full of Mini-Me Gove replicants. And in seems that in Australia it’s already happening….

“The clue about the approach Pyne is seeking to follow this week is in the snappy new glasses he unveiled at his Blue Room press conference. They are remarkably like those of Michael Gove, the current British secretary of state for education, who is busy prosecuting a culture war in English schools. This combines a radical commitment to setting up new schools outside of the framework of local government or professional regulation, while simultaneously trying to make exams harder, the curriculum more “fact” based, and leftie social workers named as the root of all contemporary evil.”

Image credit (top) SDASM Archives

Image credit (middle): Flickr vivido/rosefirerising

4 comments on “Education At War / Gove-centred learning

  1. As we daily observe the absurdities of ‘dictats’ from Education Ministers and leaders of short-lived policy ‘formulation groupings’ (I hesitate to call them think-tanks), what is clear to me is that there is a total lack of any theoretical platform for their ideas and a consequential lack of evidence on which they base their strategies. It’s so easy to make pronouncements without any basis for them. Why in academia do we spend so much care and attention to evidencing our arguments/ statements and yet politicians can pronounce as they please, seemingly without any consequences?

  2. It’s all going horribly wrong! Still over a year to go with the current bunch and there’s a lot damage they could still do to really trash things further in that time. It all seems so unjust, a tiny minority overruling common sense, all evidence and experience. What hope is there for the future especially if they get to carry on after May 2015?

  3. Alan writes in to say:

    Ah – ‘balanced consensus’ – now you really are fantasising! One of your best, I think: the First World War analogy works well without overpowering the blog altogether. Wouldn’t it be great if an institution could get representatives of all the warring parties in education together to thrash out an agreed way ahead for the next ten years, based on our best current understandings about learning and achievement? Now I’m fantasising.

  4. Agreed one of the best, and the WWI analogies are a treat. Alan may be fantasising about a sensible way forward but why is it beyond the realms of reality? Why is it not a matter of course and why are we (the people) not demanding it? Why are politicians of all parties and heads of organisations bickering and warring like mad Generals playing The Queen’s Croquet at a Mad Hatter’s Tea Party?

    It shouldn’t be a ‘them’ (the politicians) and ‘us’ (the people) situation, but it seems to have become so and all too often they (our representatives) seem to look after themselves and dictate their beliefs and will on the rest of us.

    Surely, together, we should all be taking stock and rebuilding/building-on what we have rather than pulling everything to pieces in some bitter wars of class, attitude or political belief? Unfortunately though, the kind of life-changing actions and decisions we (the people) are witnessing seem most often to be based on corporate business interests, personal financial gain and narrow-minded egotistical selfishness without considering the bigger picture?

    They (the politicians) should be making peace not war. The powers that be should perhaps learn some lessons from things like the various Peace and Reconciliation movements around the world and help everyone to work towards something for the common good. Do we really need another real war to make something like that happen? Do we need civil unrest or angry revolution? No, a peaceful and understanding revolution for the 21st century would be just fine thank you.

Leave a Reply to MrArtist Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.